Close



  • Written by JACook

    01-06-2011

    Necessity being the mother of invention, I recently set about to find a way to repair the fuel gauge sender on my '85 CFI Vert.

    The '83-'86 CFI and EFI fuel gauge senders, Ford part number E3ZZ-9375-C, are no longer available from Ford, and none of the usual sources are able to find NOS ones anymore. What's worse, they are not reproduced by anyone in the aftermarket, even though they seem to have a higher failure rate than the senders for the carbureted cars, which are reproduced. I don't know if it's because the people selling the senders are unaware of the unique nature of these senders, but whatever the reason, I really like having a gas gauge that works.

    The '83-'86 CFI/EFI sender is very different from the sender for the carbureted cars. It's actually a lot like the sender for the '87-'93 cars, but the resistance range is 80 Ohms empty and 10 Ohms full, while the '87-'93 sender is 10 Ohms empty and 165 Ohms hen the tank is full. Since I wasn't having any luck finding the E3ZZ sender, I started looking around for other Ford senders that could be used as organ donors, to repair my existing sender.

    The CFI/EFI style senders use a ceramic printed circuit resistance strip, unlike the wire-wound resistor elements in the carbureted cars. Over time, wear and corrosion from oxygenated fuels take their toll, and the result looks like this-

    Worn out original resistance strip

    For this particular sender repair, I ended up finding a donor from a very unexpected source. Dorman Factory Solutions makes a line of factory replacement fuel gauge senders, and the one I used is for, of all things, the 1984-1987 Tempo/Topaz, 2.3 Liter, without fuel injection. Who knew? This sender is Dorman part number 692-120, or Ford part number E63Z-9275-A.

    Here is the donor sender, alongside the original unit from my '85 (the grungy looking one).

    Original E3ZZ-9275-C sender alongside the donor sender.

    The senders are very different, but that doesn't matter, because we're only going to use one part. Well, maybe two, if your original float is not serviceable. It may be possible to use more of the parts from the donor sender, but there are differences that would make that a bit more work. More about that in just a bit.

    First thing we need to do is take the senders apart. The float arm is a press fit into the old sender, and will need to be pulled out before removing the sender cover. I used a pair of needle-nose pliers to gently lever the arm out of the wiper. On the new sender, the float arm is a bit easier to remove. Once the float arms are off, the housing unclips from the metal backing plate, leaving you with something that looks like this-

    Original sender housing and wiper removed

    (Yours will still have a wire soldered to the resistance strip.)

    The new sender had some of it's pins heat-smashed on the back side of the plate, but once I trimmed those, I was able to unclip the housing just as I had with the original.

    Here is a comparison view of the old and new housings and wipers-

    New sender housing and wiper next to the originals

    Notice how the plastic housing for the new sender has a smaller pivot hole. The original wiper pivots in the housing and plate, while the new wiper uses the metal float arm rod as the pivot. The newer style also has a portion of the wiper passing through the housing, to limit travel, vs the molded pegs on the original.

    In this view you can see the different size pivot holes in the metal backing plate-

    Comparison of the sender attachment plates

    If you were to want to use the newer style cover and wiper, this plate would need to be transferred over, or you would need to come up with a way to reduce the size of the pivot hole. I didn't need to do this, so the only thing I used from the donor sender was the resistance strip itself.

    To remove the resistance strips from their housings, push back the three springy tabs, while gently lifting up on the resistor strip. Don't force anything or the ceramic will break. What you should have now will look something like this-

    New resistance strip

    At this point, you have a decision to make. If you're not comfortable with soldering, or don't have the proper tools, the wires can be cut and spliced. I elected to go the soldering route with mine. If you're soldering, it's your choice whether you want to do that before or after the strip is in place.

    Installing the replacement strip is a lot like taking it out. Clip the end of the strip under the fixed guide on the left, then use gentle pressure on the strip, while pushing back the springy tabs. Don't just try to shove it past the tabs, unless you just like playing the odds.

    When you're done, it should look like this-

    New resistor strip installed in the original housing

    Before you reassemble the sender, you'll want to lay the wiper in the housing, to make sure it contacts the resistance strip properly. Also, if there is any sign of corrosion on the backing plate where the wiper contacts rub against it, you'll need to carefully clean the area. Then, it's just a matter of putting the housing and wiper back onto the back plate, and re-installing the float arm. To reduce the possibility of damaging the wiper contact, it's best to at least start the float arm into the wiper before you snap everything together.

    The arm should index with the wiper like this-

    Float arm / wiper alignment

    I omitted the housing in this photo for clarity. You will need to pass the float arm rod through the hole in the cover and then into the wiper arm, before assembling everything onto the back plate. Make sure you do not deform any of the contacts.

    You can test the finished product with an Ohm meter connected across the two pins in the connector. With the float hanging

    at full droop, you should read about 70-80 Ohms. As you move the float arm to the upper stop, the resistance should smoothly decrease down to 10 Ohms.

    The new sender comes with a new O-ring seal and lock ring. My original lock ring was nicer than the new one, but I did use the new O-ring.

    And finally, what would any good repair article be without...No More Guessing

    Untitled Document
  • FourEyedPride on Instagram

  • New Classified Posts

    Release

    1985 mustang gt

    Donít need you 2, donít need website to sell car, I have multiple foxes and no what i have 👍

    Release Today, 10:06 AM Go to last post
    bwguardian

    1985 mustang gt

    Wow, with that kind of attitude and language, no wonder it has been on the market for so long. One of the attributes I like about this site is everyone

    bwguardian Today, 09:18 AM Go to last post
    sowaxeman

    1985 mustang gt

    First off, this sight does not suck...it is the best thing out there for the Fox chassis vehicles. Its unfortunate that some have to act like "tire

    sowaxeman Today, 08:34 AM Go to last post
    Release

    1985 mustang gt

    Come see car and make your own decision! This web sight sucks a bunch of negative tire kickers kiss my a...

    Release Today, 08:05 AM Go to last post
    Release

    negative members

    [QUOTE=homer302;1862700]Since you posted an update and are still trying to sell the car. It's not that I found this ad and started commenting on it. We

    Release Today, 08:03 AM Go to last post
    2racersdad

    Nitto tires, 3:73, Nitto drag radials

    shipping on the 3:73 to 77301.

    2racersdad Yesterday, 08:20 PM Go to last post
  • Recent Forum Posts

    Release

    1985 mustang gt

    Donít need you 2, donít need website to sell car, I have multiple foxes and no what i have 👍

    Release Today, 10:06 AM Go to last post
    JD302

    '83 balljoint K8259 not fitting

    Here is a side by side of the two balljoints Moog K8259 is on the left not sure what part number is for currently installed one on right. Is that the

    JD302 Today, 10:04 AM Go to last post
    ZEN50

    Foxtoberfest 2017 Kannapolis, N.C. Photos

    Might be up for it next year Cale, heck we did Mustang Week this year so why not.

    ZEN50 Today, 09:55 AM Go to last post
    RazorbackGT

    New from Missouri

    Good looking car, welcome!

    RazorbackGT Today, 09:54 AM Go to last post
    JD302

    '83 balljoint K8259 not fitting

    Just received Moog part number K8259 ball joint and found it to be smaller than the one that fits in my spindle, does that mean I have the no longer in

    JD302 Today, 09:48 AM Go to last post
  • Recent Article Comments

    escogt

    July Ride of the Month

    Thank you, brother!!! �� Go to last post

    escogt 10-20-2017 07:18 PM
    Jerry peachuer

    July Ride of the Month

    Hell yeah!! very sharp and sits perfect one of the best looking 85s on the web

    Thanks for the... Go to last post

    Jerry peachuer 10-20-2017 06:51 PM
    sportscars

    June Ride of the Month

    Beautiful car! I have 86-126 but she isnt quite as nice as yours... Go to last post

    sportscars 10-17-2017 08:53 PM
  • Follow & Like FEP!

    Instagram